London is considered the “capital of capitalism” allowing foreign billionaires to stash tax free income offshore.
In the middle of the Indian Ocean, a thousand miles south of India, the nearest landmass, about halfway between Africa and Indonesia and far away from everywhere, is a small group of coral islands called the Chagos Archipelago. Forty years ago, its people, the Chagossians, were unceremoniously removed from their homeland by a joint operation of the United Kingdom and the United States, and essentially left beached in Mauritius as human detritus. The reason for their expulsion was that the US and the UK had decided to use the islands as a joint military facility in the post-colonial world, as they feared being booted out or needing to repeatedly re-negotiate base facilities with non-Western governments coming to power in newly independent countries across Asia and Africa.
Technically a joint US-UK venture, Chagos now houses a massive US military base at Diego Garcia. It was used for reconnaissance in the 1973 Arab-Israeli war and saw wartime use in the first Gulf War. After 9/11 it was key to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. It may house nuclear weapons and may be a “black site” for detaining prisoners. It is more secretive than Guantanamo Bay - which is probably why most people have never heard of it.
Now an impressively researched book that details its secret history goes even further and argues that Diego Garcia, and what happened in the Chagos Islands, lies at the heart of a global American empire that employs some 1,000 bases outside the United States. Their purpose: To ensure that no matter who governs in Asia, Africa or around the world, the US military would be in a position to “run the planet” from its chain of strategic island bases….
US and UK authorities do not allow journalists or independent observers to visit Diego Garcia, two other groups of outsiders are allowed. Dozens of people sailing in yachts are allowed to visit the other islands of Chagos, far away from the military base. Several thousand workers from other countries such as the Philippines and Sri Lanka are also employed on the base. Chagossians could have been so employed instead of being expelled, but it appears “locals” are not favoured, in case they start demanding “self-determination” and “democracy”.
It is important not to think of the Chagossians’ fate solely as an exceptional tragedy that befell a small number of people. As Vine points out, powerful groups or states have displaced “native” peoples elsewhere for a variety of reasons. The US itself is built through a process of displacing and impoverishing its indigenous peoples. The Bikini Atoll was “cleansed” of its people in order to be used for nuclear testing. Vine argues that Diego Garcia belongs to another larger phenomenon as well: It sits at the heart of a system of strategic bases which serve as the instruments to project US military power.
This in turn illuminates what kind of imperial power the US actually is. As he correctly points out, most Americans do not think of themselves as having an “empire” and indeed, the US is not a traditional territorially based empire. It emerged in the post-colonial age as an economic superpower and the world’s most successful “soft” power, with unparalleled intellectual and cultural hegemony.
For many years now the Chagossians have been fighting an uphill battle to obtain justice through the courts. Verdicts in the English courts had gone in favour of the Chagossians in 2000, 2006 and 2007 until the House of Lords overturned them all and ruled in favour of the British government. The Chagossians have now petitioned the European Court of Human Rights. Possibly as a pre-emptive action in case they win at the European Court, the last Labour government declared the Chagos Archipelago a “marine protection area”, which would restrict fishing and therefore human re-settlement. The Chagossians have had to take legal action against this “green” initiative as well.
"— Sarmila Bose, Senior Research Fellow in South Asian Politics at Oxfort for Jazeera.
FYI: www.chagossupport.org.uk
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/03/2012314114930627518.html
The police or security services supplied information to a blacklist funded by the country’s major construction firms that has kept thousands of people out of work over the past three decades.
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has revealed that records that could only have come from the police or MI5 have been discovered in a vast database of files held on 3,200 victims who were deemed leftwing or troublesome.
It was obvous then and now, themajority of the countries involved (besides the US and UK) had nothing to gain from the fight.
So it reasons to say that they must have had something else to gain, no?
It is a little bit disturbing to think of how easily a major power like the US (or the EU or any other body) can rapidly “purchase” a coalition, if it puts its mind to it.
Just a quick, very unfinished bit from wikipedia:
Many nations received monetary and other incentives from the United States in return for sending troops to or otherwise supporting the Iraq war.[116][117] Below is a partial list of some of the incentives offered to coalition members:
- Turkey — Turkey was offered approximately $8.5 billion in loans in exchange for sending 10,000 peacekeeping troops in 2003. Even though the US did say the loans and the sending of troops to Iraq were not directly linked, it also said the loans are contingent upon “cooperation” on Iraq.[118] The Turkish Government swiftly rejected all offers of financial aid and on 1 March 2003, the Turkish Grand National Assembly (parliament) rejected taking part in the US-led coalition forces invasion of Iraq. Such a decision of the Turkish parliament was seen as both a reaction against the unilateral action of the USA in the Middle East and the desire to keep Turkey away from the Iraq war. Turkey however, allowed all humanitarian flights into and out of Turkey e.g. for evacuating wounded US and Coalition forces.
- United Kingdom: As of 2006, the Independent reported that British companies have received at least £1.1bn contracts for reconstruction work in postwar Iraq.[119]
In addition to direct incentives, critics of the war have argued that the involvement of other members of the coalition was in response for indirect benefits, such as support for NATO membership or other military and financial aid. Almost all of the Eastern European nations involved in the Coalition have either recently joined or are in the process of joining the US-led NATO alliance (namely Bulgaria, Georgia, Albania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Romania and Slovakia),[citation needed] the exceptions being Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic, which joined NATO in 1999. Estonian Foreign Minister Urmas Paet, for example, said on April 21 that Estonian troops had to remain in Iraq due to his country’s “important partnership” with the United States.[120]
At least one country, Georgia, is believed to have sent soldiers to Iraq as an act of repayment for the American training of security forces that could potentially be deployed to the break-away regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.[121] Indeed, Georgian troops that were sent to Iraq have all undergone these training programs.[122]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-National_Force_%E2%80%93_Iraq#Troop_deployment_in_Iraq_2003-2011
Government ‘may sanction nerve-agent use on rioters’, scientists fear
Nerve Agents are classified as a weapon of mass destruction by the UN but that won’t stop the UK government from using it on the streets.
There is speculation that the UK is planning to sanction the use of chemical nerve agents against UK citizens on British streets. These could include substances whose use in warfare is banned by the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993.
Experts were commissioned by the Royal Society, the UK’s national academy of sciences, to investigate new developments in neuroscience that could be of use to the military. They concluded that the Government may be preparing to exploit a loophole in the Chemical Weapons Convention allowing the use of incapacitating chemical agents for domestic law enforcement.
Currently only such chemical irritants as CS gas or pepper spray may be used for riot control. The incapacitating agents now under consideration would go way beyond such measures.
The 1993 convention prohibits the development or use of nerve agents and other toxic chemicals by the military but there is an exemption for certain chemical agents that could be used for domestic purposes such as policing and riot control.
Poisoning by a nerve agent leads to contraction of pupils, profuse salivation, convulsions, involuntary urination and defecation, and eventual death by asphyxiation as control is lost over respiratory muscles.
(via socialuprooting)
Oh good christ
Apparently our ongoing legacy of colonialism and genocide makes great advertising fodder.
Jesus Christ BBC what the fuck is wrong with you? First Blind Banker, now this?
You are aware it’s 2012?
OH I hadn’t thought of that! I had seen some “ughs” and stuf in regard to this but I wasn’t sure why? I get why people have a problem with it now.
Yeahhhh, BBC America, you have kind of a problematic history with regards to “we claim this space, now it’s ours”-ing. The last time you came here and said that, it didn’t turn out great for the people who were already living here..
-Jess
— http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/11/20111128105712109215.html
Khosrow Roozbeh (1915-1958): leading member of the Tudeh Party, executed.
One of many Iranian communists executed by the U.S.-installed Shah.
MUST WATCH
UK Jewish MP: Israel acting like Nazis in Gaza
”My grandmother did not die to provide cover for Israeli soldiers murdering Palestinian grandmothers in Gaza. The present Israeli government ruthlessly and cynically exploits the continuing guilt from gentiles over the slaughter of Jews in the Holocaust as justification for their murder of Palestinians.” - Sir Gerald Kaufman
-
“Freedom in capitalist society always remains about the same as it was in ancient Greek republics: Freedom for slave owners.”— Vladimir Lenin (via ...
-
“Often in my lectures when I use the phrase “imperialist white-supremacist capitalist patriarchy” to describe our nation’s political system, audiences...”
-
The Dictator and The Zionist - The Trouble with Sacha Baron Cohen.
This morning, Sacha Baron Cohen is on my mind. Not...
-
this is a picture of the protest—southwestern students...
-
Anonymous asked: He said that about the NDAA BEFORE it had amendments made to it. He also said he would veto SOPA, so I think this is a sign that he at least knows what the internet does and doesn't need. (even if he's kinda daft elsewhere)
The Obama Administration attempted to censor the internet several times before, I call bullshit. Btw, Obama said he would veto the NDAA...
-
Recently, Congresswoman Virginia Foxx raised eyebrows when she expressed her lack of sympathy for those who are currently drowning in student debt....
-
The Hobbit by J.R.R. Tolkien
-
“I still say tape or taped instead of record or recorded.”— I’m old
